August 24, 2011

Reason number 6,153,218 to hate lawyers

Just over a week ago a strange gust of wind hit the Indiana State Fair grandstands just before a scheduled concert. The wind was a precursor to a late summer storm. The wind toppled parts of the stage superstructure killing seven and wounding dozens of others. It was a tragedy of epic proportions. I was not surprised to see the families of the deceased file suit. I will withhold my opinion on the merits until after the analysis of the wreckage is complete. Sometimes bad things just happen.  We all know Mother Nature is a humorless bitch. If you are attending an outside concert and the sky is turning black and ugly, do you need someone to tell you to take cover?

OK, I guess I did not hold back on my opinion.

But this is too much:
The class action lawsuit was filed Monday in Marion Superior Court by the Indianapolis law of Cohen and Malad on behalf of Angela Fischer. She was not injured in the stage collapse but said in the lawsuit she suffered “severe emotional trauma” from witnessing the carnage. source  (emphasis mine)
Seriously, need I say more? I am not advocating we search out the lawyers involved or MS Fischer and beat them senseless and give them real trauma, but have we reached the point as a society where we are to be free from any unpleasantness in our lives? Is it really up to the taxpayers to pay because someone was disturbed by tragic events? Were the unfortunate who saw the event on the interwebz less traumatized? Should we all sue? If we put in some real tort reform -- charged the loser all court and opposing attorney fees, this nonsense would stop.

Hey, as a young child I was disturbed by an image in a pictorial history of WWII showing a beheaded Chinese with a cigarette in his mouth. Should I sue Japan?  How about the photographer?

3 comments:

Fuzzy Curmudgeon said...

I think a judge ought to gather up all these lawsuits and order that they all be considered together in one court.

It's turning into "spray lawsuits in all directions and hope something sticks" and the lawyers need to be told to heel.

I heard one of them on the idiot box this morning flat out saying "the wrongdoers are in possession of the evidence". And here I thought the standard was innocent until proved guilty. Sounds like you're biased from the get-go, counselor.

Fuzzy Curmudgeon said...

Tort reform that included a wider latitude for judges to declare lawsuits frivolous and to discipline the lawyers who bring those suits would get a big thumbs-up from me.

Dave said...

I will not comment on the merits of the suits by the injured, or the families of the dead as that is the role of a jury in a civil trial.

However, I think it's preposterous to take the position that I saw what happened and I deserve compensation is absurd. If I had been there and escaped uninjured, I'd thank God I was safe and get on with my life. Yes, the memory would trouble me, but I'd get over it.

Consider everything here that is of original content copyrighted as of March 2005